To illustrate why I believe a RESTful application design is different not only in implementation details, I’ve created these two diagrams: Which has more information about me and also contains a list of published talks, podcasts, and articles. In terms of performance, one or more layers would effectively be removed from the client and server technology stacks if you don't use SOAP, so all other things being equal, a service which exposes a RESTful interface will win there.This is a single archived entry from Stefan Tilkov’s blog. Besides, some services will naturally lend themselves more to RPC based access, in which case a SOAP interface will be more appropriate. Not sure this totally answers your question, but if, as you say, you have a system that works based on SOAP (and you control the client and server) then I don't see any reason to change. you don't need a heavy RPC stack, just the ability to make HTTP requests. However, if you want to create services that are accessible and available to a wide range of clients, then the uniformity of REST services and ease with which they can be consumed is a big plus i.e. In a relatively closed system where tooling is available to generate stubs and ties based on a WSDL, this is not terribly important. All REST APIs work in a similar way, so you don't spend as long learning the quirks of each system.įor me a service implemented using a RESTful approach wins over one that uses SOAP or RPC in terms of its accessibility. In that way it's more natural and as a convention is much easier to understand. So REST works more like you'd expect browser URLs to. HTTP PUT to /products - adds a new product.HTTP DELETE to /products/14 - removes product 14.HTTP POST to /products/14 - changes product 14 to what you post in the HTML form.HTTP GET from /products/14 - returns XML or JSON for product 14.HTTP GET from /products - returns XML or JSON listing all products.REST is more of a convention for structuring all of your methods: HTTP POST to /products.asmx/UpdateProduct - changes product based on SOAP XML in the posted content.HTTP POST to /products.asmx/GetProduct - returns XML for product based on SOAP XML in the posted content.HTTP POST to /products.asmx/ListAllProducts - returns XML list of products.Typically this will be something like (for ASP.NET): There's no real convention for how these should be structured, so you always need lots of API documentation. SOAP is a protocol for sending/receiving data over HTTP as XML.Ī typical WebService will be a few methods an WSDL that describes how to call it. I know REST is an architecture and SOAP is a protocol but my question is in detail that is currently the ASP.NET WebService implementation of SOAP has REST architecture? net, however I just want to know is it really worth paying attension to REST where currently everything is running outstandingly smooth. Can anyone point me where it can define correct boundry of REST and SOAP. Or are there any other performance considerations? Reading about REST just talks very high level of client server communication but even SOAP does exactly same. All I can see that SOAP is little advanced version of REST? REST also requires some authenticated token where else SOAP uses http session which is exactly same token used for auth and other information. What is difference between REST and WebService (SOAP), I looked at the facebook api, they use HTTP headers and some parameters (probably xml or non) and return result in xml, where else SOAP does exactly same, HTTP headers + xml parameters and returns headers + xml.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |